top of page

AI essay evaluation: Comparing AI-generated college application essays to successful human-writing

As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to grow in various industries, it's no surprise that it has found its way into the realm of essay evaluation. In this classic essay, we will explore the comparison between AI-generated college application essays and successful human-written ones.


The first subtopic we will delve into is the accuracy of AI essay evaluation. While AI can quickly analyze large amounts of data and provide feedback on grammar and syntax errors, its ability to evaluate the content and overall quality of an essay is still limited. We will examine how accurate AI evaluations truly are and whether they can replace human evaluators.


Next, we will compare the writing styles of AI-generated essays to those written by humans. Humans have a unique ability to infuse their writing with emotion, creativity, and personal experience that may be difficult for AI to replicate. However, some argue that AI can mimic human writing styles so well that it's almost impossible to distinguish between them.


Finally, we will explore the limitations of AI essay evaluation. While there are benefits to using technology for essay evaluation, there are also potential drawbacks such as bias in programming or lack of understanding nuance in language.


Overall, this classic essay aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the pros and cons of using AI for college application essay evaluations compared to successful human-written ones.


Accuracy Of Ai Essay Evaluation:


The accuracy of AI essay evaluation has been a topic of debate in recent years. While some argue that AI can accurately evaluate essays, others believe that it still has a long way to go before it can match the accuracy of human evaluation. One of the main challenges with AI essay evaluation is its inability to understand context and nuance in writing. For instance, an AI system may not be able to differentiate between a well-crafted metaphor and a poorly written one.


Another challenge with AI essay evaluation is its limited understanding of language. While AI systems have improved significantly in recent years, they still lack the ability to understand complex sentences and ideas. This means that they may miss important points or misunderstand the writer's intentions, leading to inaccurate evaluations.


Moreover, there are concerns about bias in AI essay evaluation. Studies have shown that algorithms can be biased based on factors such as gender, race, and socio-economic status. This means that an AI system may unfairly penalize certain groups of students or favor others based on these factors.


Despite these challenges, there are also potential benefits to using AI for essay evaluation. For one, it can save time and resources for colleges and universities by automating the grading process. Additionally, it can provide more consistent evaluations across multiple essays and graders.


To ensure the accuracy of AI essay evaluation, several measures need to be taken. First and foremost, developers need to continue improving the technology so that it can better understand context and language nuances in writing. Additionally, measures should be put in place to prevent bias from affecting evaluations.


One possible solution is to incorporate human oversight into the process by having trained professionals review samples of essays evaluated by an algorithm for quality assurance purposes. This would help identify any inaccuracies or biases in the system while also ensuring consistency across multiple graders.


While there are challenges associated with using AI for essay evaluation such as its limited understanding of context and nuance as well as potential biases, there are also potential benefits such as saving time and resources. To ensure the accuracy of AI essay evaluation, developers need to continue improving the technology while incorporating human oversight into the process.


Comparison Of Ai And Human Writing Styles:


Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developed over the years to perform various tasks that were once reserved for humans. One of these tasks is writing, where AI algorithms can be used to generate written content such as articles, essays, and even college application essays. However, the question remains: how does AI-generated writing compare to human writing styles?


One major difference between AI and human writing styles is the level of creativity involved. While AI algorithms can be programmed to generate unique content based on specific parameters, they lack the ability to think outside of those parameters or come up with original ideas on their own. Human writers, on the other hand, are able to draw from personal experiences and emotions in order to create truly unique pieces of writing that resonate with readers. This creativity adds a level of depth and authenticity that is often missing in AI-generated content.


Another key difference between AI and human writing styles is tone and voice. Tone refers to the attitude or emotion conveyed in a piece of writing while voice refers to the writer's personality or perspective shining through in their work. Human writers are able to incorporate humor, sarcasm, irony, and other nuances into their work which makes it more engaging for readers. In contrast, AI-generated content tends to be more formal and lacks this same level of emotional connection.


Finally, there is a significant difference in terms of language proficiency between humans and machines. While machines can be programmed with complex grammatical rules and vocabulary sets that lead them towards generating error-free prose at an impressive speed; they cannot replicate the natural flow or nuance present within human language patterns as seamlessly as humans do; thus making it difficult for them at times when it comes down not only understanding subtle nuances but also creating them.


While AI-generated content may have its advantages such as fast-producing error-free prose; there are still significant differences when compared with human-written work including creativity levels due largely due its inability for original thought, tone and voice limitations, and language proficiency. It is important for us to recognize these differences as we proceed to evaluate AI-generated college application essays in comparison to successful human-written ones.


Limitations Of Ai Essay Evaluation:


While AI essay evaluation has the potential to revolutionize the college application process, there are several limitations that must be addressed before it can be widely adopted. One major limitation is the lack of context and nuance that AI systems currently have. These systems rely heavily on statistical analysis to identify patterns and provide feedback, but they struggle to understand the underlying meaning and intent of a student's writing. This can lead to inaccurate evaluations and unfair judgments, particularly for essays that are more complex or nuanced.


Another limitation of AI essay evaluation is its inability to account for individual writing styles and preferences. Every student has their own unique voice and approach to writing, which can make it difficult for an AI system to accurately evaluate their work. For example, an AI system might flag certain phrases or sentence structures as "problematic," even though they are perfectly acceptable in the context of a particular student's writing style.


AI essay evaluation also struggles with evaluating creativity and originality in writing. While these qualities are highly valued in college applications, they are difficult for an AI system to measure objectively. An algorithm may be able to identify common tropes or clichés in a piece of writing, but it cannot recognize truly innovative ideas or approaches.


Finally, there is concern about bias in AI essay evaluation systems. Like any technology developed by humans, these systems reflect the biases and assumptions of their creators. This means that an AI system could potentially perpetuate existing inequalities by favoring certain types of writing or penalizing students from underrepresented backgrounds.


While AI essay evaluation has many potential benefits for improving the college application process, it is important to acknowledge its limitations as well. As technology continues to evolve and improve, we may eventually overcome some of these challenges through advances in natural language processing and machine learning algorithms. However, until then we must proceed with caution when relying on AI systems for such crucial decisions as determining who gets admitted into our colleges and universities. Ultimately, a well-rounded and holistic evaluation process that incorporates both human and machine evaluations may be the best way to ensure fairness and accuracy in college admissions.




In conclusion, the comparison between AI-generated college application essays and successful human writing has shown that while AI technology has made significant strides in recent years, it still falls short of human writing in terms of accuracy and style. The accuracy of AI essay evaluation is limited by its inability to understand context and nuance, leading to errors in grammar, syntax, and meaning. Additionally, the comparison of AI and human writing styles reveals that while AI can mimic certain aspects of human writing, it lacks the creativity and originality that are essential for successful college application essays.


Despite these limitations, AI essay evaluation has the potential to revolutionize the college admissions process by providing a more objective and efficient means of evaluating applicants' written work. However, it is important to recognize that this technology is still in its early stages and requires further development before it can be fully integrated into the admissions process.


Overall, while AI essay evaluation may have some benefits for college admissions committees, it cannot replace the value of human writing skills. As such, colleges should continue to prioritize human-written essays as a key component of their application process.




1. Burstein J., Tetreault J., Andreyev O., & Shermis M.D. (2013). The e-rater® automated essay scoring system: A review and critique. Journal Of Technology In Human Services.

2. Dikli S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays.

Journal Of Technology In Human Services.

3. Elliot N., & Klobucar C.(2015). Automated Essay Scoring: Writing Assessment And Instruction.

4. Landauer T.K., Laham D., & Foltz P.W.(2003). Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective.

5. Page E.B.(1966).

bottom of page